- #Handbrake change aspect ratio youtube full#
- #Handbrake change aspect ratio youtube software#
- #Handbrake change aspect ratio youtube series#
There are multiple pages on what to do about this but this is what works for me currently, December 2018 – remember anything can change and frequently does, so this may not necessarily work in the future. The problem is that to convert a video to VP9 takes quite a bit of CPU resource and time and given that will happen on YouTube servers they seem to have configured things so that they only do this for popular channels – which is a bit of a bummer if you don’t have a lot of subscribers. It appears the reasons for this are quite varied, but seem likely to be around YouTube’s favored format for high definition videos being “VP9”.
#Handbrake change aspect ratio youtube full#
It usually doesn’t matter if you change the display size or go full screen the problem is likely to persist. To check go to YouTube and look at your video and right click anywhere in the video and you get a popup menu:įrom this menu select “Stats for nerds” this will then display the actual resolution:Īs you can see the above video is coming down as 1280×720 far less than the full HD it was shot in. The likely problem is that YouTube is not displaying it in the resolution you uploaded, sometimes quite a low resolution. That's why people asked for voukoder to have a spline based upscaler.Have you noticed that you can upload a full HD video to YouTube and it’s great quality but when you watch it on YouTube the quality is rubbish. They also do a bitrate based transcode and you'll get the highest bitrate only if the frame size is >= 3200x1800 and the frame rate is >= 48 fps. AVC always has a worse quality and more artifacts. it is a huge difference if they transcoded your video to AVC (=h264) or VP9.
It always transcodes your uploaded video. That's what MyPOV did here and that's what iAvoe did with supplying the encoder presets.īy the way: Unfortunately you have no control what quality you get from YouTube. The internet is full with stupid comparisons like "Is Voukoder better than ?" What does better mean? Faster? Higher quality? With what encoder and what option? There a whole technical essays from professors about it.īut we can find a compromise of settings for getting users a reasonable and satisfactory result, yes. Unfortunately users keep asking for the best settings over and over again. As metioned the nvenc encoders work differently with different gpu generations (b-frames). That's why x264 has dozens (x265 has about 200) options to configure. Unfortunately this depends also on your source material and your encoding hardware. It is all about finding the best compromise of quality, small file size and fast encoding time. (or watch video on a smaller mobile phone screen XD) there's no such thing to get good quality and concerning file size with a push of button, unless you are going lossless (and buy an enterprise SSD to spped things up ) I think that you are lost in your settings and that you forget the main thing which is not to have fun with tons of parameters but to have an effective generic solution for the majority of users who want to quickly put a video on Youtube and get a good quality.
#Handbrake change aspect ratio youtube software#
The normal user is not going to do this, he will be content with the complexity of the settings of software like Handbrake.
I do not see the point of doing 4:4:4 starting from 4:2:0 which is largely what is more popular on Youtube. GTX1650 (original) with GPU TU117 4Go GDRR5
GTX 16x0 and RTX cards have almost same performance and quality for encoding, The object of the discussion is not the encoding speed which I consider sufficient with Nvenc.
#Handbrake change aspect ratio youtube series#
No, the GTX1000 series is not the most efficient for the quality / weight ratio since it does not support B-Frames for HEVC. I'm talking about the weight / quality ratio for Youtube destination, so by also considering upload time which is a problem for many people, therefore lossless formats are irrelevant.
0 kommentar(er)
